User talk:A1Cafel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:B dash)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, A1Cafel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adding block notice[edit]

@LPfi. Should administrators have done this https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moonfvblofg2678&diff=prev&oldid=757692468 instead? -- Ooligan (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I assume the blocking admin could have added the template and they perhaps should have. I don't see any problem in it being added by another user, but I don't know the relevant practices. –LPfi (talk) 19:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, I don't see a problem with that one. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License replacement[edit]

Hello, what were you replacing with this edit? I would suggest you should review your edits and ensure no other images were stripped of their license templates. Huntster (t @ c) 13:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Huntster. I came across another image "... stripped of their license templates." https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AWe_Choose_Prevention%21_%288739845052%29.jpg&diff=746157201&oldid=591114159 It is from the same day. -- Ooligan (talk) 18:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Ooligan, there is no issue with that removal, since there was already a PD-USGov license template in place for HHS. If a more specific template is present, there is no need for the generic USGov template to be present. Huntster (t @ c) 19:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ok, thank you. -- Ooligan (talk) 20:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for slogging through the seemingly infinite number of unnecessary penis pictures we have and nominating a ton for deletion Dronebogus (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
🤣🤣🤣 Matlin (talk) 09:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Matlin: What are you laughing about? --A1Cafel (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo courtesy/courtesy of - stop nominating US Government public domain images for deletion[edit]

Please stop nominating images for deletion as they were taken by a third party and provided to the US Government - "Photo Courtesy" or "Courtesy of" - when they are marked as public domain. Copyright doesn't apply to "any work of the United States Government" if the work was "prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties". Examples: Flickr Diplomatic Security Service image marked public domain and photo courtesy of AP. AP have released it to the Diplomatic Security Service and it was prepared by their officer or employee for Flickr; Defense Visual Information Distribution Service (DVIDS) NATO image marked public domain and photo courtesy of Afghan National Police. Afghan National Police released it to NATO and it was prepared by their officer or employee for DVIDS.--Melbguy05 (talk) 22:32, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My understanding of how {{PD-USGov}} operates was wrong I discovered after posting on Commons:Village pump/Copyright and from doing research. Melbguy05 (talk) 07:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Visitors at St. Trinity Cathedral on a cloudy day.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Visitors at St. Trinity Cathedral on a cloudy day.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Whale mural Pixabay.jpg[edit]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Whale mural Pixabay.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Whale mural Pixabay.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can you explain why you seem to be repeatedly uploading images from Pixabay here, but giving them false upload dates two years earlier than the actual, which has the effect of circumventing the licence change there? Was this deliberate, or just remarkably coincidental carelessness? Andy Dingley (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The date should be directly provided based on the EXIF data. Otherwise, it wouldn't show the time in "HH:MM:DD" format. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • OK, so you're mixing the photographed-on and the uploaded-to-Pixabay dates. Do you see why that is a problem here, when that bridges the Pixabay licence change date? These all need to go. It would help if you could identify any more similar.
See {{Pixabay}}: On 9 January 2019, Pixabay switched the old sitewide license for all uploads from Creative Commons CC0 to the Pixabay license which does not meet the free content licensing requirements for Commons. Therefore, media published on Pixabay from 9 January 2019 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Muslims looking at Burj Khalifa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 03:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License header[edit]

Hi, I note that you have made this change [1] or similar to a number of US military files that I have uploaded recently. Is there something I can be doing in the upload process that can automate this? regards Mztourist (talk) 04:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mztourist: When you are choosing the license, click "Another reason not mentioned above" and type the target license into the box. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks, will try to do that in future! Mztourist (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why was this category removed?[edit]

Why was this category- Category:Files provided by Chancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland removed from this file here https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Soloch_Paweł.JPG&diff=next&oldid=757348358 -- Ooligan (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Ooligan: That photo is from the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, not the Chancellery of the Prime Minister of Poland. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your VisualFileChange use[edit]

Just so you know, this series of about 100 edits were incorrect: federal photos are {{PD-USGov}} or one of its subtemplates, not {{PD-CAGov}} (or other states' templates). Please be more careful with VisualFileChange in the future. Yours, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mdaniels5757. I reverted this and five other files from a different category a few hours before your actions. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ORE_17_-3_(24611246487).jpeg&diff=prev&oldid=758109076 -- Ooligan (talk) 21:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I probably overlook the attribution, and I found some more using the probably wrong license on that Flickr stream. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PD USGov[edit]

Pictures like the one change here[2] seem to be pretty clear PD USGov or is this a special case I don't know about? Mirer (talk) 18:10, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree. Although doing this with CC0 images could be useful (as CC0 is valid worldwide, and PD-USGov is US-only), doing this with CC-BY images is not good. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I started to revert these edit - at least the files on my watchlist. --Mirer (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changing license templates[edit]

Please do not make changes like this in the future. This is not a NASA photograph, but one by United Launch Alliance indicated as released to public domain, and using {{PD-author}} is the most appropriate template for this case. Huntster (t @ c) 14:07, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A1Cafel, this is the third message on your talk page in the last three days regarding problems with your replacements of licensing templates. This is concerning to me, especially given your lack of response. Your response (either acknowledging or disputing that each thing is a problem, and detailing any remediation efforts) would be appreciated. If you continue with making these kinds of mistakes and failing to respond and continuing with similar edits when concerns are raised, you will probably end up with another topic ban or worse at some point. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870814024).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:45, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870814044).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871023985).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870813279).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870644676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871070128).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871023200).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870644366).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871022845).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870812214).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870067842).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871078868).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870643111).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:52, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871021910).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:55, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870811279).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871021605).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870811289).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871078333).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871021400).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871078178).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870642461).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:00, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870638701).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870806929).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870805609).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870061622).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870061792).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:03, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871015385).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:04, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52870635001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Weymouth Prepares for the Coronation (52871014085).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 09:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52873215778).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52873217533).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:23, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52873152940).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52873214458).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52872773751).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52873214328).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:27, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:South Street – Dorchester Coronation (52872197397).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PD Poland[edit]

You shouldn't replace licence tags of NAC photos like that with PD Poland. We don't know if most of these photos were ever published. We do know only, that it was marked as a public domain by a trusted archive. Pibwl (talk) 21:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Pibwl: Then changed to PD-copyright holder would be fine? --A1Cafel (talk) 11:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
It would be correct only for photos, which are described on a source page with a crossed © and "Prawa należą do archiwum Wolno zwielokrotniać, zmieniać i rozpowszechniać oraz wykonywać utwór, nawet w celach komercyjnych, bez konieczności pytania o zgodę.", like in the example above. For most pre-war photos they are only described as a public domain, so the archive desn't claim to be a copyright holder, only lets us know that it is free (and we don't know if the copyright expired, or never existed, like in PD-Poland case). Pibwl (talk) 15:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, RodRabelo7 (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Coronation Day (52875619240).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:The Alternative Coronation (52876687844).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanjagenije (talk) 22:06, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


COM:AN[edit]

العربية  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  italiano  日本語  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Nederlands  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Türkçe  Tagalog  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−


Gtk-dialog-info.svg
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#A1Cafel and email from photographer. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:57, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category discussion warning

Demonstrations and protests against United States recognition of Jerusalem has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


- Jmabel ! talk 02:25, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]