User talk:Túrelio

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Busy desk.svg
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

ATTENTION: Please use my talk page rather than emailing me.


noframe
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic.

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

Please keep discussions together:

  • If I was starting a thread on your talk page, please answer there. I will watch your talk page.
  • If you started a discussion here on my talk page, I will answer here.

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008), Archive4 (2009), Archive5 (2010), Archive6 (2011), Archive7 (2012), Archive8 (2013), Archive9 (2014), Archive10 (2015), Archive11 (2016), Archive12 (2017), Archive13 (2018), Archive14 (2019), Archive15 (2020), Archive16 (2021), Archive17 (2022).


Foto[edit]

Visto le numerose foto rimosse, non metterò più foto che trovo su facebook (che sono foto libere di essere prese perchè ho sempre chiesto il permesso all'autore). Alberto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberto Davide Lorenzi (talk • contribs)

Translated: Given the numerous photos removed, I will not post more photos that I find on facebook (which are photos free to be taken because I have always asked the author for permission). Alberto. VScode fanboy (talk) 14:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Requesting support[edit]

New year greetings,

Earlier in Octo.2020 @ village pump Copyright received your positive response for assistance in uploading old images from a research paper in PDF but the web link did not open then.

Now I find a new PDF link @ academia.edu

Subsequently after some wait resource request @ Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange got positive response that 2 images are already on commons and with assistance is now needed in uploading 4 images according to following info.:

Page number and image numbers in bracket: 244(8.2), 252(8.3), 254(8.4), 259(8.6) of new PDF link @ academia.edu ( For article en:Superstitions in Muslim societies )
8.2: Better image here
8.3: Better image here
8.4: Better image here (on the dropdown at the top of the image viewer, select "f. 38 b")
8.6: Better images here
8.2, 8.3, 8.4 are certainly out of copyright, as understood by Commons policy; they're either super-old two-dimensional works,... 8.6 consists of photos (of a three-dimensional work) over which the Smithsonian claims copyright, and so may still be copyrighted (need to be confirmed for copyright status).

I do not find myself technically competent to complete activity on my own hence Requesting your kind assistance in above respect.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Bookku,
I will look into that, but it may take some time. --Túrelio (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Greetings, I hope I am not making request too early again. It's not that it is too urgent, and you can take your time, but it is quite likely that I might forget myself over a period of time. Since I was visiting commons thought it's better to drop in a message.

Thanks for your support and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:42, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Biographien[edit]

Guten Tag. Beschaeftige mich hier seit Jahren als IP mit verschieden Biographien, vor allem betreffend Zweite Polnische Republik. Bei Bearbeitung der Vermissten Personen baue ich ein Info über den zuletzt bekannten Verbleib der Person ein (weil man soetwas in wikidata nicht einbauen kann oder ich habe keine Ahnung wie man es tut). Solche Infos werden sehr oft von "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt und revertiert. Es gibt Biographien mit sehr seltenen Nachnamen die wirkliche "Einzelstuecke" bei der Wikiprogrammen sind und deswegen existieren keine automatischen Kategorien fuer eben solche seltene Namen. Fuer solche Faelle benutze ich die Schablone "DEFAULTSORT:Nachname, Vorname" damit alles richtig kategorisiert wird ... und hier das naechtste Problem : "User:Микола Василечко" enfernt diese defaultsort Schablone und danach es wird nach dem Vornamen kategorisiert. Wenn er schon so etwas tut dann soll er auch dafuer sorgen das die Dateien (die von ihm revertiert werden) nach dem Nachnamen kategorisiert werden. Da ich systematisch mit Bibliothek und Buch-Quellen arbeite ist wirklich sehr schaedigend wenn ich immer wieder in meiner Arbeit zurueckgeworfen werde. Falls Sie nicht in der Lage sind weiter zuhelfen dann leiten Sie es bitte an jemanden der es kann. Hier einige Beispiele: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Vielen Dank. Gruesse. 2A01:C22:8448:7100:1C55:E597:187C:264D 13:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translated (formatting and links omitted): Good day. I've been dealing with various biographies here for years as an IP, mainly concerning the Second Polish Republic. When processing the missing persons, I include information about the last known whereabouts of the person (because you can't include something like that in wikidata or I have no idea how to do it). Such info is very often removed and reversed by "User:Микола Василечко". There are biographies with very rare surnames that are really "one offs" in the wiki programs and therefore there are no automatic categories for such rare names. For such cases I use the template "DEFAULTSORT:lastname, firstname" so that everything is categorized correctly ... and here the next problem : "User:Микола Василечко"and after that it is categorized by first name . If he is already doing something like this, then he should also ensure that the files (which are reverted by him ) are categorized by last name . Since I work systematically with library and book sources, it is really very damaging when I keep getting thrown back in my work. If you are unable to help further then please forward it to someone who can. Here are some examples: [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] . Thanks very much. Regards. VScode fanboy (talk) 14:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dj wilman moreno is a well-known dj who helps many djs who are starting out he is a producer and is verified on Spotify his distributor is amuse there you can also verify it Valem41982 (talk) 21:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open deletion requests[edit]

Hello Túrelio, firstly thank you for your speedy deletion logs and deletion requests process. Commons:Deletion requests#Lists of requests Here, there has been a lot of request waiting to be closed since June 2020. For example, there are some requests will be closed what I opened since September 2020. As Commons admins, can you reduce these? Of course, you can't do it alone, I think some Commons admins can it together. Sorry if I'm worrying unnecessarily for deletion requests. Regards. Uncitoyen (talk) 20:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello- I am the true.cooyright owner of two images that are currently being reviewed for deletion. I have created this account to get in touch. I have also emailed the team (as requested) about the issue. No one has responded and the images (and identifiable data!) Is still on Wikipedia. When will this be dealt with? The issue is causing me serious distress XXXANONXXX3245 (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, well, I've already removed GPS-data from both images discussed in DRs. As I am not member of the support-team, I cannot answer for them. But, be aware that we are all volunteers and do this work in our spare-time. --Túrelio (talk) 16:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photos of Mother Teresa for the Mother Teresa Center[edit]

+ LDM Dear Túrelio, Greetings of peace! I am contacting you from The Mother Teresa Center. The Mother Teresa of Calcutta Center (MTC) is a non–profit organization established and directed by the Missionaries of Charity (Religious Order Mother Teresa founded) to promote deeper knowledge of Mother Teresa’s life, work, holiness, spirituality and message through the preparation and publication of her authentic writings, distribution of devotional materials, maintaining of a website, etc. For more information, please visit www.motherteresa.org . The MTC is an extension of the Office of the Postulation of Mother Teresa which was responsible for bringing to completion her process of canonization (sainthood). We came across your beautiful two photos of Mother Teresa at a pro-life meeting in 1986 in Bonn, Germany on July 13, 1986 and are incredibly touched by the incredible way you have captured Mother in this image. We are contacting you now to request you to share a copy of these photos for our records and also permission to use if needed for our MTC projects to spread Mother Teresa’s message. We would also be interested in any other photos of Mother Teresa that you might have taken. Any information or detail about her is of great interest to us, much in the same way that the memories of their mother are precious to her children. Every photo, document or testimony forms an important piece in a mosaic in her rich life and the more pieces we put together the more complete the picture. We would be very grateful for your help in this and will abide by any conditions that you might have regarding our request. And here comes another special request. We would be delighted if you would be so kind (if and when your schedule permits it) to write for us a short testimony about your experience when you met Mother and took these photos. We would like details if possible: what were your impressions, and what was that interaction like and did she give you any message etc as we would like to keep this testimony of yours in our record. We do not use any other social media except email and so I would be so grateful if you could email me back as soon as possible with your reply. God bless you Sr. M. Callisita, MC Mother Teresa Center of the Missionaries of Charity www.motherteresa.org mtcadmin@motherteresa.org — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr. Preseilla (talk • contribs) 08:29, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Information boards in Innenräumen[edit]

Hallo Turelio, du hast vor einiger Zeit beanstandet, dass ich unter anderem die in Innenräumen des Ökologisch-Botanischen Gartens der Universität Bayreuth aufgenommenen Fotos von Information boards in Wikimedia Commons eingestellt hatte. Nachdem mir die Einrichtung keine Freigabe erteilt hatte, habe ich die betreffenden Dateien wieder entfernt. Jetzt musste ich aber feststellen, dass in Wikimedia Commons sehr viele in Innenräumen aufgenommene Foos von Information boards eingestellt sind, für die ebenfalls keine Freigabe vorliegt. So ist zum Beispiel eine ganze entsprechende Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum vorhanden. Ich wäre dir sehr dankbar, wenn du dazu Stellung nehmen könntest. Gruß --Schubbay (talk) 13:12, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translated: Hello Turelio, some time ago you complained that, among other things, I had posted the photos of information boards taken inside the Ecological-Botanical Garden of the University of Bayreuth in Wikimedia Commons. After the institution had not given me approval, I removed the files in question. But now I had to find out that in Wikimedia Commons there are a lot of foos from information boards that were taken indoors, for which there is also no release. For example, there is a whole corresponding Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum. I would be very grateful if you could comment on this. Regards VScode fanboy (talk) 14:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

VScode fanboy, thanks for the translation, but I'm a native German speaker ;-) . --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Turelio, darf ich dich nochmals um eine Antwort auf meine Anfrage bitten? --Schubbay (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Turelio, leider ist meine Anfrage noch immer nicht beantwortet. Nimm doch bitte jetzt einmal Stellung. Vielen Dank! --Schubbay (talk) 13:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Schubbay,
es tut mir leid dass es mit meiner AW so lange gedauert hat. Auf einem so großen Projekt wie Commons treten natürlich immer wieder Inkonsistenzen auf, wie du sie jetzt beobachtet hast. Das liegt meist einfach daran, dass die Kontrolle der neu hochgeladenen Bilder (recent-upload patroling) aufgrund des Volumens nur recht oberflächlich und auch wohl nicht lückenlos erfolgt.
Konkret: was die Zulässigkeit von Infotafeln aus (Innenräumen von) deutsche Museen angeht, ist wesentlicher Faktor die Schöpfungshöhe des Abgebildeten, die letztlich die Grundvoraussetzung für einen urheberrechtlichen Schutz darstellt (keine Schöpfungshöhe = nicht schutzfähig). Deren Beurteilung ist aus meiner Sicht aber nicht so leicht. Bei dem willkürlich aus der von dir verlinkten Kategorie herausgegriffenen Foto File:2021 — Zweite Julireise Mateus2019 Batch (207).jpg finde ich, dass hier Schöpfungshöhe besteht, da der Text über die bloße Angabe des Gemäldes, auf das er sich bezieht, hinausgeht. Das gilt m.E. analog für das (ebenfalls willkürlich herausgegriffene) Foto File:Australischer Regenwald.jpg von dir.
Was tun? Ich könnte auf einige der Infotafel-Bilder aus "Category:Information boards in the Germanisches Nationalmuseum" einen Muster-LA stellen, um die Einschätzung der Schöpfungshöhe dieser Art von Bildern auf eine weniger subjetive Basis zu stellen. Wenn dieser LA positiv ausgeht (keine Schöpfungshöhe und Bilder können bleiben), könntest du beginnen, deine Tafelfotos hochzuladen. Alternativ könntest du ein durchschnittliches deiner Tafelfotos hochladen und ich stelle darauf den Muster-LA (unter Verweis auf die Nationalmuseums-Tafeln). --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Turelio
Jetzt muss ich mich entschuldigen, dass meine Antwort so lange gedauert hat. Aber ich war im real life zu stark beschäftigt. Nun zum Sachverhalt. Bevor man einen LA stellt stellt, sollte man User:Mateus 2019, von dem die meisten der in der genannten Kategorie enthaltenen Fotos stammen, bitten zu versuchen, nachträglich eine Genehmigung des Urhebers der Info-Tafeln einzuholen, wie Du es mir seinerzeit auch vorgeschlagen hast. Würdest Du das bitte übernehmen? Vielen Dank. --Schubbay (talk) 16:32, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Turelio.
nachdem schon wieder fast zwei Wochen vergangen sind, möchte ich dich nochmals an meine Bitte erinnern. Schubbay (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Siehe: User_talk:Mateus2019#Fotos_von_Museums-Infotafeln. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Da hat sich leider seit 26. Mai nichts mehr getan. Könntest du dich freundlicherweise nochmals darum kümmern? Vielen Dank. Schubbay (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

pics delete[edit]

hi, i would like to delete all my uploaded images. Perencal (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Perencal,
as all your uploads are already from >7 days ago, you need to open a regular deletion-request. However, not as the one you made for File:Muğla 83.jpg, which is incomplete und irregular. On the respective image-page you need to click on "propose deletion" (or what is written there in your language) in the tool-box at the left side of the page. In addition, "user request" is not a valid rationale for images uploaded >7 days ago. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, This pics do not belong to me. I divorced someone. And she want for it to be deleted.--Perencal (talk) 11:14, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Túrelio, you did not answer me. Look, I told you, I'm divorced. And that woman said delete the pictures or there is law. please i am in trouble, delete the pictures.--Perencal (talk) 16:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Perencal, ok, this is quite unusual, as originally you claimed it to be own work. As there is a theoretical risk that your divorced partner might sue re-users outside of Commons/Wikipedia, we need to have a record of this issue. So, please send an email with a list of all concerned files and the explaination that they will be courtesy-deleted for the reason you provided above, to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). They will store this information, but will not make it public (I will have no access to it). They will also send you a ticket number, which I ask you to post here, so that I can mention the ticket at time of deletion.(the ticket-number does not mean access). --Túrelio (talk) 18:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

...

Massive abuse![edit]

Hi Turelio, I have to report massive abuse by User:Dajana L with respect to Coat of Arms of the Government Institute of political science File:Грб Института за политичке студије, Београд.png (uploaded, accorfing to that user, by the former Director of the Institute, that passed away! See here [31] for director Živojin Đurić. In addition, all other hers contributions on Wikimedia Commons were without proper permits or fake(s), as well.109.93.112.71 17:09, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, due to Christmas I can take are about that only on monday. --Túrelio (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Need to make a license tag[edit]

Hi! I've recently found a photo that is public domain in Kyrgyzstan due to copyright expiration, but I cannot upload it to Commons yet because there is no template for works public domain in Kyrgystan because of copyright expiration (the only tag available for Krygyz works is an exempt tag). Could you create a template for this? Kyrgyzstan has similar copyright laws to many other post-Soviet republics like Uzbekistan (50 year post-publication for anonymous works, 50 years after death of author if author known) that already have tags on Commons. Can you make a tag for this or delegate this to someone who knows how? Thank you!--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 19:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image files marked for 'Speed deletion'[edit]

Hello!! Sorry, It seems like I disturbed the commons, though I followed the protocols without noticing the errors. I tried to fix some image problems as I've listed below;

  • The youtube link provided as a copyvios for File:Aslay.jpg does not show any image of Aslay or resemblance, I've looked the whole video, you can prove that too. The Image appears nowhere on the internet.
  • I replaced an image file for File:Tanasha Donna.jpg. Will it still be deleted?
  • Image File:Joseph Marwa (actor).jpg is a free image uploaded to Flickr, I uploaded it to the second website (cited as copyvios) myself. I've taken the image down from the second site, hope it can survive. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In my time-zone it's too late for a detailed reply today. However, honestly, all your uploads look like they are not your own/original work. --Túrelio (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I tried fixing them by uploading new versions to some of them and tried both of the nominated Images with tineye.com with 0 results from the web, that makes me have the original copies of the work, I honestly use web archives to look for one time taken image that was deleted,take them and give them free licenses through flickr(since they've got low qualities). Having a high quality image of a living individual to attach it to any meta page is really hard, but re-owning the low quality images is quite something. Have a good night, Hope you'll reconsider the request. Afyaniuhai (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


File deletion[edit]

Hello! I would like to ask you about a deletion of this image: c:File:Гольденберг А.Х.jpg

It was uploaded for an article ru:Гольденберг,_Аркадий_Хаимович about a scholar from Russia by mr. Goldenberg himself, since the current photo is rather old and of poor quality. The photo is from his personal archive. I speak on his behalf as his relative. The image was later deleted by you. Why was it deleted? The cited reason is «copyright violation»; the image, once again, is from his personal archive.

To avoid further misunderstandings, the article itself wasn't written by mr. Goldenberg or any of his associates, his only contribution to the article was an image replacement. Veidenov (talk) 17:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Veidenov,
the reason it was deleted is that it was found in a pdf-file at https://science.asu.edu.ru/index.php/files/download/2181. Such findings generally hint to the suspicion that an "own work"-claim might not be true. Now, if Mr. Goldenberg is sure this image was either shot by himself (option 1) or has obtained the copyright from the photographer (option 2), we may solve this issue by sending a permission. If option 2 is true, then ideally the photographer him/herself should send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). If option 11 is true, then Mr. Goldenberg can send the permission by himself. You should go to Commons:Email templates and copy the boxed text under "Email message template for release of rights to a file" (or the equivalent in Russian language (Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team/ru)) and paste it into your local text-editor. Then add the filename of the image (from Commons) and the name of the choosen free license. Then, mail it to Mr. Goldenberg and ask him to either send it to the photographer or by himself sign and date it and mail it back directly (not forward) to the above mentioned address. The email will not be made public; only our OTRS-volunteers can read it. --Túrelio (talk) 17:35, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would like to specify it a little bit:
1) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, and was never published anywhere, does he have a right to upload it?
2) If we have a photo from mr. Goldenberg's personal archive which is not a selfie, but was taken with no commercial intent, by a friend or a student, and then sent to him, but was later used in a publicatiob, does he have a right to upload it?
It's all a pretty narrow scholarly circle where everyone knows each other and none of the publications are commercial, Russian copiright laws in the field of science are weak and largely neglected, and nobody really bothered with any sort of copyright legalities during the publishing og the book you linked - it was a student's photo made during some conference, it was later used as an illustration for the book which is a collection of articles dedicated to mr. Goldenberg's 70th birthday. It's really implausable that either the publisher (the university where mr. Goldenberg works) or a technical original author of the photo in question (his student) would in any way object to using this image in a wiki article, but also actually bothering with trying to get a technical permission from a student who graduated several years ago would be a pain.
If a photo was taken with no commercial intent, was never used in any commercial way, was sent to a person on the photo in a private manner, and depicts no one elce, does he have a right to upload it without making an original photographer do any paperwork? The old man just wants to look nice in his own Wikipedia article -- Veidenov (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File delation without asking about (Ticket Ticket:202211)[edit]

During the past month and also this month I have been exchanging emails about the copyright of different images uploaded by me, until I proved ownership of them. No one asked me about this particular photo. Before deleting it, and given that it was included in an article and was quite representative, I think it would have been better to ask me about. The photo is my own work. It was made by my mother and she died more than 10 years ago. Could you tell me what is the problem?MorenaClara (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No idea about which file you are talking. (I've performed 250+ deletions today) --Túrelio (talk) 13:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oh, likely it is File:Telar antiguo para confeccionar espolines.jpg. It had been tagged for deletion by OTRS-agent Ganímedes for "Impossible to verify authorship." --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yes, that is the one (I included the tickect number). Then, what can I do? It is my mums work and now it is mine. I was in the original picture and cut off myself. She died, as mentioned. Ganimedes did not contact me about that picture as she did with others. Any suggestion? Thank you. MorenaClara (talk) 16:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You need to talk to Ganimedes or OTRS. I am not an OTRS-volunteer, so I don't have any access to OTRS-communication.(therefore the ticket# didn't help me to find the filename) Probably you need to convince them that you are the heir of your mother's work/copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much. I thought you were an OTRS-volunteer, I was confused. I will try to contact her. MorenaClara (talk) 20:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sports logos[edit]

Hi!

Firstly, thank you for deleting the Kaohsiung Steelers logo. I was unaware of the high quality rule at the time, but it makes sense from a copyright perspective. Second, I want to ask how it would be possible to add a logo to the wikipedia article. I can see them in the NBA team's pages, euroleague team pages, and it just adds to the page quality, it makes it easily recognizeable. So, any suggestions, svg format or another platform instead of wikimedia commons (they dont allow logos) maybe? Thanks for your hard work and time! MrSplashman77 (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi MrSplashman77,
if you want to add it to :en-Wikipedia, you could upload the logo locally at :en and then claim it as fair-use (en:Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline). If you want to use it on a Wikipedia, which has no exemption-policy, then you might ask a user from Taiwan if he/she could look whether the logo is permanently displayed/installed somewhere outdoors and then take a photo of it and upload it to Commons, claiming freedom-of-panorama. If that is not possible, then you need to ask the Kaohsiung Steelers directly of they are willing to release the logo under Commons-compatible free license. --Túrelio (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gerda Thune Andersen[edit]

Hi, according to this file these are made by Gerda Thune Andersen: File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque C. G. Schultz.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Else Roesdahl.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Holger Schmidt.ajb.jpg, File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Olaf Olsen.ajb.jpg and File:Fyrkat Møllegaard.Plaque Sv. Søndergaard.ajb.jpg. Due to the no FOP in Denmark for art and her not being dead yet, or at least not long enough for them to be free, the files should be nominated. Since they're from the same artist, is the nomination supposed to be a single request, or does one make one for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You can combine them into 1 DR. When I want to do this, I start the DR-script for 1 file, and then simply copy the resulting template from the processed file to all the other files and add their filenames to the DR-page. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hmm, I think... I know what you mean, but what about the notification to the uploader, they would only get one, do I add the other files as a list underneath in the same section or use the template for each? TherasTaneel (talk) 19:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ah, if the files are from different uploaders, then you need to click on the template on the affected files and copy the uploader-notification-link and paste it on the uploader's talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion[edit]

Hi, if you have time, could you clear out the above category? I tend to put all the poor Fleuron-related images in there, they're simply not worth any more effort. I'm not sure if anyone else uses it. Thanks in advance. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:34, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I'll look into it early next week. --Túrelio (talk) 14:10, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 12:55, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SVG conversion[edit]

Hi. I'm wondering if this SVG File:Seal of the City of Salatiga.svg is a valid conversion from File:Lambang Kota Salatiga.png. There're a great deal of changes. I don't see any modifications on the cite website https://salatiga.go.id/tentang-salatiga/lambang-daerah/ Pinging uploader RaFaDa20631 for any inputs -- DaxServer (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Updated: I updated the arms on 18 February 2023 as a part of evaluations/corrections among coats of arms of regencies in Java. The original citation/reference is a law/regulation document titled 1997 Regional Regulation No. 5 (Peraturan Daerah Kotamadya Dati II Salatiga No. 5 Tahun 1997, documented at JDIH Kota Salatiga) as I mentioned before... RaFaDa20631 (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Walkie T на баттле против Изтолпы.png[edit]

What's wrong with the file? same CC license. Нейроманьяк (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are correct. Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File deletion[edit]

Hi~ why the "なぞクー「Goo」" pictures deleted? even Mysterious Qoo did not appear in the introduction of friends on the official website, but Mysterious Qoo is a official character that did appeared in the past. Here are three ads that which Mysterious Qoo's appeared：

①CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーWEB篇) (2004年6月) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfVRy0R0Ddk ②CM 「镜にうつったのは......」(なぞクーグッズキャンペーン編) (2004年) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEuQzLgDGFE ③CM「Qooの乳酸カシス子汁」篇（2005年3月24日）https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvdJj71OGIs Tamiacoco (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg[edit]

Hi Túrelio. Would you mind taking a look at File:Christian Holst Vigilius, 2022.jpg when you have the chance? This file has the same name as a file you deleted on December 11, 2022, as a copyvio, but I don't think it's the same file. However, I'm also not too sure that the uploader's claim of "own work" is valid either since the EXIF data for the new reference is the kind that often comes from photos downloaded from Facebook. Most of this uploader's uploads are fairly high photos of Danish politicians being claimed as "own work". There's almost never any EXIF data or source information provided to help verify any such claim. That fact that first version uploaded of this file (i.e. the one you deleted) seems to have also been uploaded as "own work" even though it was clearly attributed to someone else and most likely came from some website makes me a bit concerned that the uploader might just be not being sufficiently diligent when it comes things like COM:Own work and COM:NETCOPYVIO. They might mistakenly think that downloading a file from somewhere online somehow means they now own the copyright on the file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Anders Stjernholm, 2017.jpg is the most recent file uploaded by this user. Its EXIF data also suggest it comes from Facebook and the EXIF data actually attributes to the file to "Roberto Borgen Fb.com/RobertoCapture". Unless that can be verified by VRT to be the uploader, it seem the uploader is simply taking photos from online and uploading them to Commons regardless of their copyright status. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Question[edit]

Hey, Túrelio, may you help me out with these two images? They’re marked as valued, but apparently they were simply cropped from the real valued image: this and this. Best regards, RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The author suggested to quickly delete the image[edit]

I'm the author and I would like to delete it quickly image Dự thảo Bảng lương Sĩ quan Quân đội và Công an Việt Nam năm 2021. Because: I'm about to release a new version of the image but it's extracted from a .png file so I need to request that the old image be removed before I can post the new image. Please help me delete old pictures. Thank you. Taitamtinh (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bitte[edit]

Guten Tag Túrelio,
darf ich heute mal wieder mit einer persönlichen Bitte an Dich herantreten.
Da ich sehr viele Seiten und Bilder öffne, werde ich besonders in letzter Zeit mit einer Unmenge von Wikipedia-Bannern und -Infos, ich sage es offen, genervt.
Meine Frage: Kann man diese Banner global ausschalten? und wäre es möglich, dass Du mir diese Funktion in mein Userkonto eingibst?
Ich wäre Dir sehr dankbar. Beste Grüße. Orchi (talk) 12:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC) P.S. ...offensichtlich ist mein Antiwerbebanner nicht o.k.Reply[reply]

Hallo Orchi,
war seit Vormittag unterwegs. Mich nerven die Banner auch etwas; normalerweise reicht es für eine Sitzung, wenn man das Banner durch Klick auf das x schließt. Wie man das global oder zumindest projektweise ganz abschaltet, weiß ich leider nicht. Da müsste ich mich auch erst schlaumachen. --Túrelio (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Guten Tag Túrelio,
vielen Dank und hoffentlich Erfolg bei Deinem Mühen. Grüße Orchi (talk) 10:02, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Islatravir structure.svg[edit]

Hallo Túrelio,

warum hast du meine hochgeladene Sturkturformel (File:Islatravir structure.svg) gelöscht mit dem Hinweis, dass es ein Duplikat auf File:Test.svg wäre - Test.svg ist aber eine universelle Anlaufstelle, um svgs vorab zu testen (temporary file for testing whether SVG files will correctly render when uploaded on Commons.). Nachdem ich zufrieden war, habe ich dann unter korrektem Name die Strukturformel hochgeladen. Mittlerweile gibt es duztende andere test.svg-Versionen.

Daher bitte Islatravir structure.svg wiederherstellen. --Julius Senegal (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Julius, ein Duplikat-Bot hatte sie als Duplikat markiert. Hab sie wiederhergestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wunderbar, dankeschön. --Julius Senegal (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File deletion (Michelle Akers entry)[edit]

Hello Túrelio, I saw your request for the deletion of said file, included in the Michelle Ankers entry here on wikipedia. Since I saw you were very keen to help check that the image is suitable for this site, I ask you if you would like to help me find a picture of her to put on her profile. It is very important for me that women in soccer are given recognizion and a picture on her Wikipedia entry would mean that. Sorry about the non-technical language, I am new on Wikipedia. Saludos! SANDIACELESTIAL (talk) 07:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi SANDIACELESTIAL,
as Commons accepts only uploads that are verifiable freely licensed (per COM:L) by its creator, you need to search for such images. A fertile place for that might be flickr.com. If even a thorough search doesn't yield any usable image, you might either try to contact Michelle Ankers and ask her whether she would be able to provide a freely licensed image of herself, or, if you want to use the image only on :en-Wikipedia, you may claim a not freely licensed image under the fair-use exception. The latter cannot be uploaded to Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 08:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disney characters[edit]

Disney frequently sues for their copyright, so... shouldn't all of those in the Category:Disney characters on stamps and subcategories (perhaps even some of the parent categories) be looked at? TherasTaneel (talk) 20:29, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, thanks for notifying. However, I am not a specialist for the intricacies of U.S. copyright. I recommend to put that question at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 07:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Antalya waterfalls[edit]

Greetings. The file you falsely accused me for copyrights violation, comes from my device. Please, restore the file. Thank you. GreatBernard (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, you are correct. The patroler, who had tagged the image as copyvio-suspected, wrongly thought that the images were identical, which is not the case. Sorry. ✓ Restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted Category[edit]

Hello @Túrelio, I wanted to create a category for an entity, but I realized that it had been deleted by you before.

The category is "Category:Mina Luna". I am a new here and I don't seems to know the reason for the deletion, so i would like to know all that concern the category and if I can recreate it Dcraigo (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Dcraigo,
the cat had been deleted as it had been tagged by another user as "duplicate" of Category:Mina Luna Vincent. However, the latter doesn't exist. So, you may decide by yourself whether cat:Mina Luna Vincent or cat:Mina Luna would be more appropriate and then (re-)create it. --Túrelio (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello @Túrelio
I have checked both cat:Mina Luna Vincent and cat:Mina Luna, both have been deleted, and I am not sure if any of them can be restored or i can just go ahead and recreate it. If they can't be restored, can you provide me with an article that can guide me on category creation?
Thanks Dcraigo (talk) 05:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi Dcraigo,
see Commons:Categories#Creating a new category. If you tell, which one you want to (re-)create, I can do it for you. --Túrelio (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, I don't know if I will be able to create it all by myself. Can you help me to create it instead? The category is for Mina Luna Dcraigo (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Just like Guilldermo del toro category Dcraigo (talk) 11:44, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think Category:Mina Luna Vincent would the appropriate name. However, as it had formerly been deleted for being empty, is the any Commons-compliant content? --Túrelio (talk) 13:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay no problem
But what is Commons-compliant content Dcraigo (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Content that is validly under a free license, compliant to our license-policy. Problem with restoration of this cat is that currently there seem to be no Mina-Luna-related images on Commons. So, if I undelete or recreate said category, it will be deleted again soon as being empty. --Túrelio (talk) 07:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hello, do you copyright for the category and images of her? Dcraigo (talk) 12:40, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, I do not really understand your question "do you copyright ?". What do you mean by that? --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
i mean is it copyright for the category Dcraigo (talk) 17:35, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That does not make any sense. I get the impression that you do not unterstand what I wrote on April 25th and 26th. The category about which we are talking since 2 months, was deleted several times because it was empty. There were no images of said Mina Luna Vincent available. If that is still the case, then it makes no sense to recreate said category, because it will again be empty. --Túrelio (talk) 19:09, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Ohh okay I get
there is image of Mina Luna on wikicommon now which has been used on different languages of Wikipedia and other wiki sisters. And if more image is needed, there are available that I can upload with upload wizard Dcraigo (talk) 20:33, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What is the filename of said image? --Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jazmin_Yvette_Gonzalez_Luna.jpg Dcraigo (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well, this file has already been requested for deletion by someone else. So, as I assumed earlier, there seems to be no legitimate content for the discussed category. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cabot Logo.png[edit]

Hi Túrelio. This is in reference to User talk:Túrelio/Archive17#File:Cabot Logo.png since File:Cabot Logo.png was deleted by Krd on March 28, 2023 per COM:CSD#F5 but then reuploaded the following day by a user named Rockswanson. It still has the same issues as before, and my guess is that the uploader is either Cabotcoop or someone else associated with Cabot Creamery. I don't think this file can be keep without VRT verification or something else showing it has been released under as licensed; at the same time, it's going to start being disrupted if a new account is created to reupload the file each time it's deleted. Any suggestions on what to do here? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lotta Svärd badge.svg[edit]

How do you do? Could you please explain why this file got deleted? Sincerely, Kwasura (talk) 12:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Kwasure, it had been tagged for deletion by somebody else as "Derivative work of the badge designed by sv: Eric Vasström in 1922 who died in 1958." I had tagged it as "deletion error", as it could technically not be deleted (unknown reason) for some time. But, finally it was deleted by a colleague of mine. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Modern swami[edit]

cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Speech Why We Disagree.ogg and File:Text-Video-World-Parliament-of-Religion-1.ogv. This presumably also applies to File:Vivekananda1.ogg (see its talk page), File:Text-Video-Weltparlament-der-Religionen-SV.ogv, and File:Text-Audio-SV-World-Parliament-of-Religion-disagree.ogv. CC Infrogmation who closed the DR. The videos give Youtube as their source, and the description on Youtube give Wikisource as their source (where the videos were in use until today when I removed them, as they are not compliant with the annotations policy in addition to be being likely copyvios). So almost certainly they are modern user creations by the same person that added them to enWS. The audio file seems to have been confirmed as a modern fake since there are no known recordings of the speech in question. Xover (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Map of Terek oblast (Russian empire) 1862.png[edit]

File:Terek oblast 1862.png. This card of the same series. On the external site since 2012 and in the Commons since 2019. You are sought to look in the version of the deleted file where there is a link. 195.19.124.2 01:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Regarding the "Most handsome boy in the world"[edit]

You may need to just Special:Nuke Falakhussain786's uploads. They're all just personal snapshots amd selfies, mostly with filenames of some permutation of "Most handsome boy in the world". Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 09:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

local maps by year category[edit]

Good day, thanks for your work. I notice you deleted Category:1855 maps of New Orleans with the comment "incorrectly named) duplicate, content moved to Category:1850s maps of New Orleans" - not strictly true, as it is an intersection of 1855 maps, 1855 in New Orleans, and 1850s maps of New Orleans. That being so, I'm wondering about the reason for deletion. Why was this category not appropriate to exist? Wondering, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Infrogmation,
I found the cat empty and speedy-tagged[32]. The cited comment is the default of the C2-speedy script. Please, feel absolutely free to undelete it. --Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I'll have to check, sounds like someone else emptied it out first. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bild Wegekreuz in Hergenrath[edit]

Hallo Túrelio

heute habe ich bei einer Radtour ein Wegekreuz hinter der Kirche in Hergenrath aufgenommen, aber beim Hochladen ist mir ein Missgeschick passiert, wobei ich nicht weiß welches. Das Bild wird auf jeden Fall nicht angezeigt, obwohl es ordnungsgemäß wie immer hochgeladen wurde. Ich vesuchte es mal mit einer neuen Version, doch irgendwie klappt das nicht. Was ist zu tun???

Vielen Dank im Voraus, ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hat sich erledigt, jetzt ist es da (wie von Geisterhand), Gruß --ArthurMcGill (talk) 16:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Prima. Ich hatte am Nachmittag im Garten gearbeitet. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Open access journals confirmation[edit]

Hey Túrelio. I'm confident that I understood it right that these journal articles are indeed at the tagged license:

Could you be kind and confirm the same? There're a ton of these articles which would be benefited uploading here [unless they're already on Internet Archive?] Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi DaxServer,
✓ Done. The 2nd one has conflicting statements wrt the license-version; website says 4.0, pdf says 2.0. But doesn't matter much. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you very much:) DaxServerOnMobile (talk) 07:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hey. I'm wondering if I could semi-automate the uploads. It seems most of it can be. I'm wondering if it is regarded as bot editing. If so, I'd have to get the Bot approved? -- DaxServer (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg[edit]

Hi Turelio, about the image of Silvio Scaglia you have deleted (File:Silvio-Scaglia.jpg) dec 2022, Mr Scaglia have send at that time an email, as request, with the autorization. Let me know why the image was deleted and please let me know what to do to upload again. Ciao --Abyssadventurer (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Abyssadventurer,
there wasn't any hint of a permission in the file-description. Had the said permission been sent to OTRS/VRT? --Túrelio (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Question Copywriting[edit]

Hello Túrelio, An image I uploaded last week has been deleted for "Copywrite violation". I have the permission from Qwant to use this image in the french page of "Qwant Junior". How can I proceed to submit it with the permission attached? Thanks! Drai000 17/04/23 Drai000 (talk) 12:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,
in the description (was it File:HP Qwant Junior.png?)) there wasn't any mention of a permission. Did they sent it to OTRS? See Commons:Email templates for the process and a template for such a permission. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Astounding service[edit]

I have no idea how you have the patience nor the energy to delete all that requires deletion. Thank you for your hard work 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 09:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, someone has to do it. You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 09:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bruckner' Works on the German Wikipedia[edit]

Dear Túrelio,

In the past I have updated the pages on the Bruckner works which were already present on the English Wikipedia and created individual pages for all the other Bruckner works with exception of the piano and organ works and the Kitzler-Studienbuch for which I have created a descriptive list. Thereafter I have translated/adapted all these pages on the French Wikipedia. I am updating these Wikipedia pages every time there is new significant information about the Bruckner works.

I just have started on 14 April 2023 to do the same for the German Wikipedia. I have already created the pages Messe für den Gründonnerstag and Missa Solemnis (Bruckner), and expanded the already existing pages Kronstorfer Messe and Windhaager Messe, but it is not an easy job because of my not optimal practice of the German language. Do not hesitate to have a look on these pages and to improve their content.

Have a fine day! Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 12:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, Réginald. I'll look into it. --Túrelio (talk) 06:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neilson[edit]

All locomotives in this category https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_Reid_locomotives need changing to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Neilson_locomotives 89.240.14.140 10:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi 89.240.14.140,
that's an issue of :en-Wikipedia, not Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Missing permission of copyvio[edit]

When it comes to album covers and film posters with no evidence of permission is it better to mark them as copyvio or to mark them as missing permission? Trade (talk) 20:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, well, both would be ok. A possibly more specific strategy might be to tag those, which are simply claimed "own work", as copyvio, and those, which are (more or less properly) sourced, though without compliant license, as no-perm. That might have an educatice effect on uploaders. --Túrelio (talk) 06:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Amb. Konstanty Radziwiłł.jpg[edit]

Hi, why did you delete this file? It was published under Creative Commons 3.0 PL, not Cc-by-nc-nd-3.0? Niegodzisie (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sorry, didn't check before deletion. Now restored. --Túrelio (talk) 06:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg[edit]

This file I uploaded (File:Charles Stanley 2020 (QS2dw7EzUk0).jpg) was deleted due being tagged as a copyright violation. However, the video this file came from came straight from the official channel (In Touch Ministries) and was uploaded initially with a CC-BY mark, as evidenced by this Archive link of the video when you click the Show more tab: https://web.archive.org/web/20200810013925/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2dw7EzUk0

With this, and because CC licenses cannot be revoked, may this file be undeleted please?

Thanks for your time. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You are correct. However, as the deletion was performed by my colleague Polarlys, I would recommend to ask him directly. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Alrighty, thanks for telling me. StrangeloveFan101 (talk) 10:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear Turelio[edit]

I'm using your image of a knight in my book for grade 3s AcerBS (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for notifying, though I have no idea to which of my images you are refering. --Túrelio (talk) 18:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeronimo Rodrigues[edit]

Dear Túrelio. About File:FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUESjpg.jpg, could you please send me the link to the page from where the copyrighted image was extracted? A.WagnerC (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure: https://www.bahia.ba.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FOTO-OFICIAL-JERONIMO-RODRIGUES.jpeg . --Túrelio (talk) 18:58, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you! A.WagnerC (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does this image of Jerônimo Rodrigues meet the Commons requirements? I ended up uploading one of restricted content in the Wikis projects, but if this one works, I will replace them. A.WagnerC (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, sure. It is under a free license of a credible Flickr-account. --Túrelio (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion of File:How to pronounce k6ka.ogg[edit]

Hi Turelio, I just noticed that this sound file was deleted for "username pronouncation of banned user created in violation of ban". I'm a bit confused by this, since I was the one who recorded the sound file, and as far as I'm aware, I'm not banned from Commons or any other Wikimedia project. I did notice some IP users (88.237.3.193 and 88.252.99.51) that have been tagging my files for deletion, and also causing trouble on IRC. Per this edit, it's evidently an enwiki LTA. Could the sound file be undeleted, since this is clearly a mistake? Thanks, —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, sorry that I didn't notice that. File restored and IP-protected. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review[edit]

Hi. If you are available, could you confirm that File:Alyssa Sutterland 2023 02.jpg's license is valid? Have a nice day. Nyxaros (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 18:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicate redirects and deletions process question[edit]

Here- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Secretary_Blinken_Meets_with_Mayors.jpg&action=history you created a redirect to the duplicate file and deleted my upload.

My three uploads from the U.S. Department of State had the same source, same file size, same date and exact time, but were deleted. I understand that the second User to upload the "duplicate" file, as determined by the date/time stamp, gets deleted. How did you determine that all three of my uploads were to be deleted? I also noticed that 2 of my 3 deleted uploads were listed on the duplicate template page as "1." and the two kept files were "2." What criteria determines which file will be listed as #1 and #2? In addition, my files were more thoroughly categorized than the current files. Why did you not merge my valid categories unto the kept files?

I appreciate your ongoing effort on duplicate file clean up and thank you for helping me better understand this process. -- Ooligan (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Túrelio. ,Please, respond to my questions above. Thank you -- Ooligan (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Oops, sorry for the delay. A while ago I was ill for a week and then obviously forgot your request.
I rarely tag files for duplicate-deletion by myself. Sometimes, I correct the syntax of a duplicate-deletion-request by somebody else, which makes it look like I requested the duplicate-deletion. In the vast majority of cases I perform duplicate-deletions requested by other users. In case the files are in different image-format, for example TIFF and JPEG, I either reject the deletion-request or convert it to a regular deletion-discussion. In rare cases, when I think the tagged image should remain and the other should be deleted, I may reverse the deletion-"direction". If files are totally identical, usually the older upload shall remain. Usually, I visually compare the description and categories between the to-be-deleted and the to-remain image, though every now and then it may happen that I overlook something. As duplicate-deletion is something completely different then copyvio-deletion, I have no problem to revise/revert my action. So, if you want one of your files/images undeleted, just tell me. --Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
1st uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265407
2nd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265408
I believe that these my two uploaded files above were listed in the duplicate tag as "1." (to-remain) and should have been "kept." Please, "revise/revert" my two uploaded files above.
This file below with same date and time, my uploaded file was listed in the duplicate tag as "2." (to-be-deleted). So, no action needed.
3rd uploaded file at 02:40, 29 April 2023 - https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=338265409
Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:56, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've undeleted the 2 above mentioned files, though they had the identical upload-date/time as their duplicates (now processed). However, yours were a bit more thoroughly categorized. --Túrelio (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletions of fictitious flags[edit]

Hi Túrelio

Is there a way to resquest a speedy deletion of all these flags : Flags of Provinces of Algeria recreated yesterday whereas they had been removed in 2022 ([33])

All these flags are fictitious and fanciful.

The contributor Russian Onest has also uploaded other such fictitious flags ([34]) --Poudou99 (talk) 00:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mel B Image[edit]

Hello, you recently undid my speedy delete request at File:Mel B New York 2017.jpg. However, the linked file that I listed as a copyvio is the original version of the uploaded file. In order to avoid copyright detection, the uploader changed her hair, clothing, and flipped the photo at an attempt to avoid copyright detection. Flipping the images show that they are clearly from the same source. The same thing also happened with File: Geri Halliwell attends New Year's Eve Party.jpg, however, the image I linked is not an exact match like the former, and I have not been able to find a perfectly exact match as of yet. The linked photo is the closest I've been able to find. Given that the photo has been clearly doctored in a way that has been done to the former, its copyright status is at least highly questionable. Breaktheicees (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, ok. I've put it into regular DR. --Túrelio (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Is that necessary? That one is clearly a dupe. Compare the images when flipped, please; see: [35] Breaktheicees (talk) 16:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Maalimalar.jpg[edit]

Could you look at this file and give me a proper citation for the paper it's a scan of? The file is cited (with no other bibliographic information) at w:Vizhithelu, and I'd prefer to improve that rather than just deleting the citation or tagging it with {{Dead link}}. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, no, I can't, as I didn't tag it. However, per its appearance it's clearly a scan (a finger of the scanning person is even included) of a newspaper, though the newspaper-header was cut. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg[edit]

This media file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion. 89.40.24.1 01:44, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, I don't think so. It had already been discussed twice, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Microsoft Edge logo (2019).svg. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:QUEEN CAMILA (2023).png[edit]

Thank you for closing the deletion discussion of the above file, but please note that the file itself is not deleted. Thanks. Celia Homeford (talk) 07:33, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Oh, there were more than the one 1 had already deleted. Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 07:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I found a photo from the same source as the deleted photo.
Possibly this photo also lacks proper authorization (?
File:CharlesIII.png 2401:E180:8883:9AFC:56A2:FF1:2493:1592 14:20, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for notifying. --Túrelio (talk) 15:14, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Rome-1945033.jpg[edit]

FYI, I restored the above file a moment after you deleted it (I was already working on this user's uploads) because Pixabay was actually CC0 before 9 January 2019, so this file was OK (it just needed proper COM:EI, which I added). See {{Pixabay}} for more information. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Same thing for File:Pexels-skitterphoto-615344.jpg and File:LeiFerAlcivarez--Sao Paulo de día.jpg :). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06: Memorial Hall[edit]

Hallo Túrelio, schon öfter hast Du als Admin einen Wunsch von mir als einfachem User ausgeführt, wofür ich Dir endlich mal danken möchte! Und bei dieser Gelegenheit gleich eine Frage: ich habe versucht, die im Betreff genannte Diskussion zu schließen und war der Meinung, dass jetzt ein Bot das Thema ins Archiv verschiebt, was aber bisher nicht der Fall ist. Habe ich etwas falsch gemacht? Dass ich als Eröffner der Diskussion diese schließe, ist sicher suboptimal, aber ewig offen bleiben sollte sie auch nicht. Tatsächlich wurmt es mich etwas, dass ich nicht gleich auf die Lösung mit der Kategorien-Weiterleitung gekommen bin. Telford (talk) 09:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Telford, ich denke dass das eine vernünftige Lösung ist, sowohl hinsichtlich des redir als auch der (üblichen) Plural-Kategorie. Da Commons irgendwie eine "lebendes" System ist, das sich über die Zeit entwickelt und nicht von vornherein bis ins letzte durchgeplant war, passiert es immer wieder, dass eine ursprünglich angelegte Kategorie/Gallerie/usw. sich irgendwann als unpassend erweist und ersetzt werden muss. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Túrelio, danke für Deine Zweite Meinung! Eine Frage ist aber noch offen: warum bleibt die Diskussion auf Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2022/06 und wird nicht automatisch ins Archiv verschoben? Ich hatte angenommen, das dies nach ein paar Tagen von einem Bot erledigt wird, auch wenn ich dazu keinen Hinweis finden konnte. --Telford (talk) 10:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Túrelio, darf ich Dich noch mal an diese Frage erinnern? Ich vermute stark, dass Du als Admin weißt, wie man das richtig macht, und meine Frage nur untergegangen ist. Vermutlich steht die Antwort auf irgendeiner Hilfe-Seite, aber ich finde Commons in dieser Hinsicht etwas unübersichtlich, weshalb ich mir erlaubt habe, Dich persönlich anzusprechen. --Telford (talk) 07:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Suppression d'une photo non artistique prise sur la voie publique en Italie (reportage / tournage de film)[edit]

Bonjour, Comme j'ai pu en débattre longtemps avec plusieurs administrateurs de Commons (notamment le regretté Patrick Rogel et plus récemment Racconish), la suppression du fichier suivant est non conforme, selon le PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italie.jpg

Dès lors qu'une photo non artistique (reportage ou photo de promotion, notamment) est prise sur le sol italien avant 1976, que ce soit pour le tournage d'un film italien, français ou d'une autre origine, la conséquence reste valable. L'origine du photographe n'entre pas non plus en compte. La seule exception concerne les photographies dont le caractère est manifestement artistique. Le débat a été tranché depuis bien longtemps et le cas de certaines photos comme celle-ci, par exemple, est comparable : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Louis_de_Funès-L'Homme_orchestre_(1970)_(recadré).jpg Cordialement. Tisourcier (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(sorry for my poor english) :
Hello, As I have been debating for a long time with several administrators of Commons (in particular the late Patrick Rogel and more recently Racconish), the deletion of the following file is not in conformity, according to PD-Italy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italy.jpg
As soon as a non-artistic photo (reportage or promotional photo, in particular) is taken on Italian soil before 1976, whether for the shooting of an Italian, French or other film, the consequence remains valid . The origin of the photographer is not taken into account either. The only exception concerns photographs whose character is manifestly artistic. The debate was settled a long time ago and the case of certain photos like this one, for example, is comparable.
Best regards. Tisourcier (talk) 15:11, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hi, the second linked file/image is dead. Anyway, I can undelete and put it into a regular DR. --Túrelio (talk)

Same problem with the same IP[edit]

The same IP is attempting to ask for a speed deletion of this item : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trint-couple.jpg

Could-you prevent this before Racconish answer these problems ? Thank's. Tisourcier (talk) 17:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My colleague Yann has already keep-closed the related DR. --Túrelio (talk) 20:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:PD-IsraelGov/layout[edit]

Rename:

  • Coat of arms of Israel.svg → Emblem of Israel.svg

Rkt2312 (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

No idea what you are telling me. It was renamed already in 2011. --Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The Lockdown Sessions Cover[edit]

I never claimed to be the copyright owner on my upload of the album cover, the source I linked (https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/sonybmg/images/roger-waters-the-lockdown-sessions-cover-2660638) is from the official Sony Music Entertainment Sweden website which has the cover licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Miklogfeather (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sure, that was the rationale by the tagger. Anyway, I've undeleted the file and put it into a regular DR, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Roger Waters - The Lockdown Sessions - Cover.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Faustão 2015.png[edit]

Greetings. Thanks for the warning about this image. I edit from the phone and the Vimeo license does not appear for me. I have to use the "computer version" on the phone, there it shows. Pgnm (talk) 20:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yeah. It's really not nice that they hide the license on a second page. --Túrelio (talk) 20:51, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wrong files deleted[edit]

These twenty (19) files were tagged as exact "duplicates" and were deleted. My uploaded Flickr files were deleted, yet they were all uploaded about four (4) hours before the ones that were kept. They had been tagged with a Duplicate tag, but my uploaded files should not have been deleted.

Please, revert or undelete these twenty (19) files at your earliest convenience. Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 03:15, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Avis demandé[edit]

Cher Túrelio, auriez-vous la gentillesse de vous pencher pour un avis sur cette page de discussion : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Françoise Huguier par Claude Truong-Ngoc Août 2022.jpg .

Avec mes remerciements, Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 08:10, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mynewsdesk[edit]

Could you please verify the license of File:Daft Punk - Random Access Memories.jpg and File:Random Access Memories 10th Anniversary Edition.jpg? The fact that the two images comes from Mynewsdesk should be cause for serious scrutiny Trade (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also File:Daft Punk in 2013.jpg--Trade (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The first 2 image were already licensed-review by my colleague Yann. I did it now for the third one. As the subdomaine, where these images are offered, has "sonybmg" in its name and as contacts to Sony company are presented on that page, I think we can assume it to be legitimate. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Túrelio&oldid=765682024"